Staring At the Sun
I shake
And stare the sun
Till my eyes burn
— David Bowie, "The Voyeur of Utter Destruction"
Light is sweet, and it is pleasant for the eyes to behold the sun. — Ecclesiastes
The dawn ventures to confont the sky decorated with multiple colors ...
My eyes have an entirely different brilliance. I am afraid they
will make holes in the sky. —Nietzsche
The biggest drawback to mirrorshades is that they simulate a state of
permanent solar eclipse, a twilight world in which colors are distorted
and shadows are deeper. The sun has been both feared and revered
throughout human history, but only a handful of people have actually
had the courage to look it in the face. Granted, the naked eye
will sustain impairment if exposed to direct sunlight for too
long. Therefore, cyberpunk author Paul Di Filippo recommends
optical implants as a solution. “By stepping down the ratio of
photons to electrons,” he suggests, “you can do such things as stare
directly at the sun or at a welder’s flame without damage.”
But why stare into the sun in the first place? Because it's
dangerous. Because it's deviant. Because so few are man
enough to try it. Because radiation is natural. Because it
looked at you first. Perhaps the best reason of all is that the
sun frees us from the simplistic dogma of dualism. Photons of
light have no antiparticle. That means that in the world of light
there is no division between body and soul, good and evil, seer and
scenery, past and future, man and fellow man. In the world of
light, 1 + 1 = 1.
Photographs of the sun are typically taken through telescopes.
Such photographs are pale substitutes for actually looking at the
sun. As naturalist Annie Dillard notes in an essay about
witnessing a total eclipse, "The lenses of telescopes and cameras can
no more cover the breadth and scale of the visual array than language
can cover the breadth and simultaneity of internal experience.
Lenses enlarge the sight, omit its context, and make of it a pretty and
sensible picture, like something on a Christmas card." Scientific
instruments, then, limit our perception even as they extend the range
of our vision. No matter what apparatus we use to view the sun,
at some point we will encounter a "blind spot." Clearly, the
naked eye (capable of detecting a single photon of light) or naked
implant is the only way to go.
There are two steps to proper sun-staring. First, stare at the
sun with the eyes open. This is not an easy thing to do.
Rochefoucauld, the Benjamin Franklin of France, once said that "Neither
the sun nor death can be looked at with a steady eye." He was
correct. In his novel
Staring at the Sun, Julian Barnes warns
that "You can't stare at the sun for too long--not even the setting,
quiet sun. You would have to put your fingers in front of your
face to do that." So don't have any preconceptions that it's
going to be simple or pleasant. Try not to blink. Try not
to look away. Shield your eyes with your fingers at first if you
must, but then slowly spread your fingers to reveal the awesome light
of the sun. If you must look away then do so, but slowly bring
your eyes back to the sun. If you find yourself involuntarily
blinking rapidly, hold your eyelids open with your fingers.
Second, stare at the sun with the eyes closed. The sun's
afterimage will remain under your eyelids, indelibly etched into your
cornea. James Patrick Kelley describes this phenomenon in his
cyberpunk story "Solstice": "Cage shut his eyes and still he
could see it: blood red, flashing blue, veins pulsing across its
surface."
What is the significance of this afterimage? No doubt each person
must find his omn answer to this question. In her novel
Century 21,
Ewa Kuryluk attempts a philosophical answer. She says that "We
must preserve the sun's afterimage under our lids" because it forces us
to confront "ideals, abstract beings which are neither bodies nor
forces dwelling in bodies." Perhaps she means that we can harness
the sun's forces, snatch them from the physical body of the star, and
carry them with us--literally within our eyelids. In any case,
Kuryluk seems to be touching upon a deeper truth about the perception
of reality.
The French poet Paul Claudel agrees with Kuryluk that we can carry the
body of a star within our eyelids, making us the center of our own
private solar system. "We can see in the eye a sort of scaled
down, portable sun," he says, "and therefore, a prototype of the
ability to establish a radius from it to any point on the
circumference." The German poet Yvan Goll describes such a
private solar system:
The universe revolves around you
Eye with
facets which chase away the eyes of the stars
And implies them in
your gyratory system
Carrying away nebulas of eyes in your madness.
The
Maja-Ratri, a Sanskrit
text, says that light is the source of all thought, since light is a
combustion of star evolution. That star evolution exists in the
inner dimensions of your mind as a phosphene explosion.
Psychologist Carl Jung once wrote that "when our senses react to real
phenomena, sights, and sounds, they are somehow translated from the
realm of reality into that of the mind. Within the mind they
become psychic events, whose ultimate nature is unknowable."
If you're eventually going to have your eyes replaced anyway, why not
burn them out in a single blaze of glory? Besides, the
combination of sunglasses and a walking stick is a timeless fashion
statement.